Signet MCP
Review an agreement against a selected policy and inspect the quoted clause or documented absence behind each finding.
Where does this Statement of Work fall short of our policy?
Procurement and legal teams reviewing contracts they are authorized to access.
- Interface
- MCP server
- Access
- Request access
- Availability
- Access by arrangement
- Runs on
- Hosted service
API key required · Request access
Request Signet MCP access- Cairn roles
- AI connectors
- Evidence roles
- Source, Citation, Checks and support, What is missing
- Semantic context
- Source meaning
- Contribution
- Review contract factors against a policy using quoted clauses or documented absence and inspect the resulting findings.
- Limit
- AI extraction can be wrong. A policy verdict is not legal approval, and access is limited to authorized documents.
What it does
- Search and retrieve authorized SoWs, MSAs and order forms.
- Assess extracted factors against a policy with quoted evidence or documented absence.
- Compare contracts, inspect renewals and review linked SoW/MSA coverage.
Illustrative request, not a scored contract
A synthetic SoW says: Work is accepted when the Buyer is satisfied. Ask whether the acceptance criteria meet your policy.
Use the contract's factor findings, quoted clause or documented absence, and the named policy to review the acceptance terms. Where an MSA supplies missing terms, inspect the combined assessment.
No customer contract was accessed, uploaded or scored for this example. It does not assert a PASS, REVIEW or FAIL result.
Setup
Tell us the document types, policy, authorized users and MCP client. We will arrange scoped access and provide connection details. Document intake uses an upload slot and asynchronous ingestion; do not paste confidential contracts into a public enquiry form.
Request Signet MCP accessCoverage and freshness
Documents in the acting user's authorized spaces and the selected policy. Extraction and document quality affect available findings. Confirm policy selection and scope during provisioning.
Limits
- AI extraction can be wrong. A deterministic score does not make the extracted clauses infallible.
- A policy verdict is not legal approval or a substitute for reading the agreement.
- Uploads and ingestion change the document store; they are separate from reading an existing assessment.