Someone will ask where a number came from and whether it was current. We answer with the records themselves, including the ones that disagree.
A surprising amount of the evidence is already public.
We start with what anyone can check: public filings, regulatory records, market data. This bond is one we worked through.
Your data makes it specific. The gaps stay named.
Your contracts, positions and invoices fill in what public records cannot. Where nothing can fill the gap, we say so.
We started with a bond because the records are public. The work is the same for a vendor increase, a contract, or a policy.
Procurement
Put the contract next to market prices, what you paid before, and what else is available. Then separate what only this vendor provides from what you could replace.
Keep it. Renegotiate it. Knock it out.
How we work
Start with a question someone has to answer. Find what the evidence actually supports. Make it repeatable. Keep it when we leave.
01 / Command
Name the number or claim someone will have to defend, and who will have to defend it.
02 / Reveal
Show what the sources confirm, what they dispute, and what they cannot support. Name the gaps out loud.
03 / Run
Turn the record into something that keeps working: a receipt, a monitor, a report that rechecks itself when the data changes.
04 / Keep
Keep the sources, rules and receipts. The answer has to survive every vendor who touched it, including us.
Yes. We do too. The problem is knowing what to trust when a model sounds confident.
We connect the model to the right evidence, checks, and workflow so your team can use it in a real decision and run the same process again.
Two examples built on real data, with the sources visible.
Source check
Loom uses public data to respond to questions. Each response shows the source, what changed, and the date the data was true. Ask for evidence and you can open the full source trail.
Procurement signal
An agent built this signal from public data in days. It combines energy prices, producer prices, and industry use to show when an increase may hold. A team's contract data makes it more precise.
We don't have client logos to show you. We have 375,000+ receipts you can call right now.
Each receipt checks one stated fact, like a loan balance or a note rate, against the SEC filings that reported it, and says plainly whether the sources agree. That is 375,000+ receipts across 43,000 loans in 521 CMBS deals, free to call, no account.
A logo asks you to take someone's word for it. A receipt lets you check ours. We would rather be judged on the second.
We have been using the words “quick win” a lot recently but I think what we just witnessed here redefines what a quick win is.
We agree on the decision, show you work you can inspect, and continue only if it is useful.
Tell us what needs to be decided, when, and what information is available.
By the end of day two, you will have real work to review.
Continue only if there is a useful next step.
