When somebody has to defend that number, what do they show? If the answer is a person, a spreadsheet, or a screenshot, we show what it rested on: the sources, the dates, where they disagree, and where coverage runs out.
A lot of what you need to check is already public.
We start with what anyone can check: public filings, regulatory records, market data. The same loan is already in the filings, often more than once. The work is lining those records up, field by field, and keeping the disagreements.
Your data makes it specific. The gaps stay named.
Your contracts, positions and invoices fill in what public records cannot. Where nothing fills the gap, the receipt says so.
A bond, a vendor increase, a contract renewal, a policy exception. What they show is often a person, a spreadsheet, or a screenshot. The records change. The work does not.
Procurement
The contract against market prices, what you paid before, and what else exists.
Keep it. Renegotiate it. Replace it.
Structured finance
The same loan in two filings, compared field by field, disagreements kept.
Confirmed. Conflicting. Not covered.
Compliance
What the approval rested on, who signed it, and which sources still hold.
Standing. Stale. Unsupported.
How we work
Name the number someone has to defend. Show what the filings and records say. Leave something that rechecks itself. Keep the trail after we leave.
01 / Command
Pick the number or claim someone will have to defend, whoever or whatever produced it. A holding, a tape field, a vendor increase, a policy exception.
02 / Reveal
Show what the sources confirm, what they dispute, and what they cannot support. Say the gaps out loud.
03 / Run
Turn the record into something that keeps working: a receipt, a monitor, a report that rechecks itself when the data changes.
04 / Keep
Keep the sources, rules and receipts. The answer has to survive every vendor who touched it, including us.
Every receipt makes the next answer cheaper to defend.
Yes. We do too. The problem is knowing what to trust when a model sounds confident.
We connect the model to the right evidence, checks, and workflow so your team can use it in a real decision and run the same process again.
Connect Receipts free, then buy EDGAR or GEO credit packs when you need more. $20 for 1,000 usable calls, no access request.
Two examples built on real data, with the sources visible.
Source check
Loom is our question-answering service, built on public data. Each response shows the source, what changed, and the date the data was true. Ask for evidence and you can open the full source trail.
Procurement signal
We built this signal from public data in days. It combines energy prices, producer prices, and industry use to show when an increase may hold. A team's contract data makes it more precise.
We don't have client logos to show you. We have 375,000+ receipts you can check right now.
Each receipt checks one stated fact, like a loan balance or a note rate, against the SEC filings that reported it, and says plainly whether the sources agree. That is 375,000+ receipts across 43,000 loans in 521 CMBS deals, free to use, no account.
A logo asks you to take someone's word for it. A receipt lets you check ours. We would rather be judged on the second.
We have been using the words “quick win” a lot recently but I think what we just witnessed here redefines what a quick win is.
We agree on the number, show you work you can inspect in 48 hours, and continue only if it is useful.
Tell us which number has to be defended, when, and what information is available.
By the end of day two, you will have real work to review.
Continue only if there is a useful next step.
